Reasoning setting
- Context window
- 131.07K tok
Performance profile
Capabilities
Context window
Modalities
Measured setting
Reasoning trade-offs
Source (opens in a new tab)- Intelligence Index
- 12.5
Pricing & access
No API offering listed in our tracked sources.
Run locally
~3.8 GiB
RAM + VRAM
Estimate assumptions
One text chat at the selected context, with a 16-bit cache and app allowance. Operating system and image processing are extra; optimized caches can use less.
8 GiB RAMwithout GPU offload
- Weights
- 1.5 GiB
- Context cache
- 0.3 GiB16-bit cache
- App allowance
- 2 GiB
- Download
- 1.6 GB
- Disk space
- ~7 GB
Set up in Ollama · Q4_K_M · 8K context
Save the following as Modelfile. The context matches the estimate above.
FROM hf.co/bartowski/MiniCPM5-2B-GGUF:Q4_K_M PARAMETER num_ctx 8192
Then run these commands in your terminal:
ollama create llmcurrent-local -f Modelfile ollama run llmcurrent-local
Ollama import instructions (opens in a new tab) · For LM Studio or Jan, open the app’s model search, enter bartowski/MiniCPM5-2B-GGUF, choose Q4_K_M, and set context to 8,192 tokens in the app’s model settings. Software links above open each app’s setup guide.
Benchmarks
Full leaderboardSource (opens in a new tab)Humanity’s Last Exam
Frontier reasoning- 1Claude Opus 5.5Max61.4%
- 2Claude Fable 5.1Max59.1%
- 3Gemini 4 ArgonHigh57.1%
- 94Granite 4.2 8BReasoning9.7%
- 95Nova 2.0 Pro PreviewMedium9.4%
- 96Ling 3.0 TinyReasoning9.3%
- 97MiniCPM5-2BReasoning8.9%
- 98Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructStandard7.6%
- 99Qwen3.5 Omni FlashStandard7.6%
- 100Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B (Reasoning)Reasoning7.5%
Peers use their best measured result on this benchmark.
Alternatives
- Scores higherGranite 4.2 30BReasoning
- Intelligence Index
- 12.7+0.2
- Cost / task
- $0.072
- Similar scoreNemotron 3.5 LightningReasoning
- Intelligence Index
- 12.9+0.4
- Cost / task
- $0.093
- Similar scoreCommand A+Reasoning
- Intelligence Index
- 13.1+0.7
- Cost / task
- $0.00
Each model at its highest-scoring measured setting · Intelligence Index v4.3.2 and its evaluation cost per task.